Tuesday, April 8, 2014

Staying Within the Boundaries or Thinking Outside of the Box

The title of this post is my way of differentiating between two completely opposite learning theories.
The most recent theory I have become familiar with is that of the "banking concept of education" which the  theorist, Paulo Freire has written about.  The banking concept of education theory focused on a very straightforward way of distinguishing the roles of teacher and student. "Education thus becomes an act of depositing, in which the students are the depositories and the teacher is the depositor. Instead of communicating, the teacher issues communiques and makes deposits which the students patiently receive, memorize, and repeat." This concept leaves no room for students to question why, but instead leaves students to only believe whatever it is that the teacher says as truth. This learning theory is not fit for the world we live in today because it doesn't promote individual growth at all but is a tool instead which "mirrors oppressive society as a whole." Conformity is not desirable, and it is fair to say this theory surrounds itself with creating students into members of society who will not question authority or strive to make a difference in any way shape or form. Freire discusses this 'banking concept' but does not agree with it. Instead, he believes students and teachers should be using a 'dialogic approach' that revolves around mutual respect. Freire, although not a horrible theorist in my eyes, still seems to lack a passion I find important in teachers, to provide quality education. Instead i find Freire's focus to be on creating a learning style which promotes individual choices but to redefine societies and/or create social justice.   



A second theory which I have mentioned before is that of Montessori.  The Montessori theory focuses on the students curiosity, a calm and safe environment, and involves multiple methods of learning. Montessori is the complete opposite of the banking concept of education. This theory encourages students to make choices for themselves, develop into their own individual selves, along with working together to consider other points of views. So then, in contrast, Montessori's learning style promotes self-interest and development of individuality. 


Overall, I agree with Montessori's theory of learning more so than Freire's, but I do see many similarities that they share with one another. Most importantly, both do not support the banking concept of education, which I most certainly agree with them on. I wish the banking concept could be disregarded, but unfortunately some teachers apply it in their methods without even realizing sometimes. This is where passion comes in. If a teacher is passionate in aspiring her students to be their own selves and to excel in the abilities to learn and think independently, then I'm sure the banking concept won't be appearing in their methods.




No comments:

Post a Comment